The Great Debate is a national public-speaking competition that emphasises constructing clear, evidence-based historical arguments rather than direct rebuttal. Participants are assessed on the strength of their reasoning, use of evidence, and delivery, with judges often asking follow-up questions to explore their understanding. The London heat formed part of a wider national programme leading to a final round.

Evie’s contribution stood out for its clarity and analytical depth. She argued that while public records provide structure and authority, personal accounts add essential detail and perspective. Her response demonstrated a strong grasp of how historians interpret evidence and construct narratives about the past.

This event reflects the wider work of the Historical Association, which promotes high-quality history education through resources, publications, and competitions. Initiatives like the Great Debate give students the opportunity to develop critical thinking, oracy, and a deeper understanding of how history is studied and communicated.

Congratulations to Evie on this impressive achievement — a true credit to herself and our school!